Defendants' motion to stay pending reexamination was denied even though "the USPTO has issued a final rejection of all asserted claims of the [one patent-in-suit] and an initial rejection of all asserted claims of [the other patent-in-suit]." Instead, the court ordered the parties to "confer on an appropriate schedule to complete the court-ordered discovery in time to meet the current trial setting."
Crane Co. v. Sandenvendo America, Inc. et al., 2-07-cv-00042
(TXED August 6, 2009, Order) (Everingham, M.J.)
No comments:
Post a Comment